At a high-level, a reverse mortgage allows you to borrow against your home equity to fund retirement without making regular repayments.

My wife and I are in our 70s and rapidly depleting our superannuation funds, so are considering a reverse mortgage.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
When you run down your savings, but own your own home and don’t want to move or downsize, then a reverse mortgage can be a suitable option.
Often it’s suitable for retirees who are asset rich and income poor.
Historically they have not been popular in Australia, but that is slowly changing.
At a high-level, a reverse mortgage allows you to borrow against your home equity to fund retirement without making regular repayments.
Interest compounds over time and the loan is repaid upon either selling the home, moving into care or passing away. This allows you to stay in your home while accessing cash.
Some important considerations include:
If you do go ahead, you then have a choice of obtaining the reverse mortgage from a retail provider or from the federal Human Services Department, via its Home Equity Access Scheme.
A private provider can potentially lend more and provide large lump sum payments. HEAS provides conservative loans and mainly only income payments (except a small advanced lump sum).
Under HEAS, your combined loan and age pension payment each fortnight can’t be more than 150 per cent (1.5 times) of the full age pension.
HEAS has a current interest rate is 3.95 per cent a year, which is very low compared to the market. If you just need a small income top up, look at this scheme first.
Reverse mortgages are not for everyone, but they do make sense for some people, and they can provide valuable retirement income.
I am thinking of moving back to my home country of New Zealand to retire after living in Australia since 1979. I plan to retire at 63 and live off my super until I become eligible for the age pension.
However, I read on the Centrelink site that you need to have lived in Australia for two years prior to applying for the age pension. And there is consideration of where you have lived prior to that.
Does that mean I have to move back to Australia for two years to claim the pension, and then relocate back to NZ?
I’ve worked all my working life in Australia and none in NZ, and don’t want to retire with no option of a pension.
Most people think the income and assets test is the only criteria for applying for the age pension. But you are correct, there is a “residence” requirement.
To qualify, the following residency requirements must be met:
However, there are some exemptions from the above. The main one being if you are claiming under an international agreement.
Australia has an agreement with 32 other countries, including New Zealand. Given your circumstances you should be able to claim directly from New Zealand.
You can contact Services Australia for the details.
For a list of the countries that have agreements with us, and how it works you can view: Which countries have international social security agreements with Australia – International social security agreements – Services Australia
(I note a significant country missing from this list is the UK).
Craig Sankey is a licensed financial adviser and head of Technical Services and Advice Enablement at Industry Fund Services.
Disclaimer: The responses provided are general in nature, and while they are prompted by the questions asked, they have been prepared without taking into consideration all your objectives, financial situation or needs.
Before relying on any of the information, please ensure that you consider the appropriateness of the information for your objectives, financial situation or needs. To the extent that it is permitted by law, no responsibility for errors or omissions is accepted by IFS and its representatives.
Want to see more stories from InDaily SA in your Google search results?