2026 is a transition year for sustainability reporting in Australia, as expectations around assurance and credibility begin to take shape, writes BDO’s Aletta Boshoff.

While Group 1 entities are starting to report, many other organisations will use 2026 to start preparing for mandatory sustainability disclosures in the years ahead.
For Group 2 and 3 entities, 2026 is a critical preparation year. This is when the governance, data and reporting foundations will be built to support repeatable, assurance‑ready disclosures that can withstand increasing levels of scrutiny.
This article, based on the January Sustainability webinar, outlines what’s changing in 2026 and what organisations should be focusing on now to prepare with confidence.
In 2026, expectations are maturing quickly. Sustainability reporting is continuing to shift from a standalone exercise to something that is more integrated, data‑driven and closely linked to financial outcomes and long‑term value. Boards and finance teams are increasingly including climate‑related information as part of the broader organisational story about performance, risk, resilience and long‑term outlook.
For many organisations, this means sustainability information is increasingly expected to:
The reality is that at the same time, assurance expectations are becoming clearer. Recent Illustrative Corporations Act Sustainability Assurance Reports show how assurance will be phased in, progressing from reviews (Limited assurance) to more detailed audits (reasonable assurance) in future years. Even so, in early reporting years, assurance providers still read the whole sustainability report to ensure the information is consistent and not materially misstated.
To support preparers, illustrative sustainability reports, like this one from BDO, show how sustainability reporting can be approached. These examples help organisations translate reporting requirements into practical structures for disclosures, documentation and evidence, particularly where internal capabilities are still developing.
At the same time, recent amendments to Australia’s climate-related disclosure requirements are helping to clarify how this information should be prepared. These changes, which align closely with international standards, reduce unnecessary complexity, especially around greenhouse gas emission disclosures. With ongoing global developments, these changes bring greater comparability and consistency in sustainability information for investors and other primary users, a trend that will continue in 2026 and beyond.
One of the biggest changes in 2026 is that sustainability reporting moves from simply getting something on the page to being able to stand behind what’s reported. Being “assurance‑ready” in 2026 doesn’t mean having perfect data or a full audit – it means being able to explain, support and evidence your disclosures.
Even where assurance remains limited in the early years, organisations should expect reviewers to look for clear documentation, traceable data and consistent approaches that can be applied year after year. In practice, assurance providers will still read the full sustainability report and test whether the information makes sense and is not materially misstated.
To meet these expectations, many organisations should use 2026 as a time to build or strengthen a small number of practical foundations, including:
Tip: Starting this work early can make future assurance processes much more efficient.
For an in-depth look at what auditors will expect and how to prepare your disclosures, systems and documentation, read Ensuring your mandatory sustainability report is assurance-ready.
While Group 1 entities refine and strengthen their approach after the first reporting cycle, 2026 is a pivotal year for Group 2 and 3 entities preparing to enter the mandatory reporting regime. Under the reporting timeline:
The priority for the first year of reporting should be on building the right foundations to support sustainable reporting processes for years to come. Organisations that transition well will use 2026 to put the basics in place – setting governance, confirming reporting boundaries, improving data processes and documenting key decisions. That groundwork makes reporting easier to repeat and puts organisations in a much stronger position in the coming years, when assurance really counts.
Under AASB S2, materiality is assessed using a two‑step approach.
Step 1: Organisations identify climate‑related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect their prospects, i.e. prospects assessment.
Step 2: They determine what information about those risks and opportunities is material and needs to be disclosed, i.e. materiality assessment.
Understanding this distinction early helps organisations focus their efforts appropriately, even before detailed materiality assessments are performed.
For Group 1 entities, 2026 is a chance to build on what they have already started. The focus should be on using the year to put better controls in place, strengthen oversight and make reporting more consistent from year to year. Doing this early has many benefits, including building trust with stakeholders and reducing the risk of last-minute issues.
For Group 2 and 3 entities, key actions for the year ahead should include:
Whilst doing this, organisations should document processes, decisions and assumptions. BDO’s experience working with organisations at different stages of the reporting journey shows that those who prioritise governance, traceability and consistency early are better placed to manage increasing scrutiny over time.
As sustainability reporting becomes more embedded and assurance expectations increase, organisations need reporting that is robust, repeatable and defensible. BDO’s sustainability reporting specialists help organisations assess readiness, strengthen governance processes and build reporting that stands up to scrutiny.
Want to see more stories from InDaily SA in your Google search results?