The Stats Guy: The money problems each generation will face in the 2030s
Australia’s cost of living conversation usually focuses on short-term pressures.
We zoom in on fuel prices, supermarket specials and interest rate speculation. Yet bigger forces are shaping our financial wellbeing operate over decades rather than months.
Demographics, housing markets, public finances and technological changes all influence our money challenges.
Today we step back and look at the major financial hurdles facing each generation.
This column is about structural rather than personal pressures. Understanding them helps us anticipate where political tension, consumer behaviour and household stress might head next.
Pre-boomers (born before 1946)
The final chapter is expensive
Australians born before 1945 are in their 80s and 90s. Their financial challenge is not accumulation but endurance. The next decade is overwhelmingly about aged care, health expenses and the complexity of navigating support systems.
Many in this cohort own their homes outright and rely on the age pension plus modest savings – asset-rich but cash-poor.
Rising aged-care costs and stricter means-testing create anxiety, particularly when one partner requires residential care while the other remains at home.
Longevity risk is real, but so is cognitive decline, which increases vulnerability to scams and poor financial decisions.
For pre-boomers, financial security is less about returns and more about stability, simplicity and protection.
Baby boomers (born 1946-63)
Wealthy on paper, worried in practice
Baby boomers are the richest generation in Australian history.
They benefited from cheap land, long careers, generous wage growth and the enormous uplift in house prices across the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Yet even a wealthy cohort can feel financially vulnerable.
The first challenge is longevity. Many boomers will spend 25 to 30 years in retirement. That means more years of managing health costs, navigating aged care, and ensuring that savings last as long as they do.
You might like
Even asset-rich boomers often describe themselves as income poor.
Many haven’t paid into their super accounts throughout their whole working life. Their wealth is tied up in homes rather than liquid income producing assets.
Boomers are afraid to run out of money before they run out of time. I discussed this dilemma in my column on the “Die with Zero” concept.
The second challenge is the awkward but unavoidable conversation about inheritance.
Boomers will transfer a gigantic amount of wealth to their millennial children eventually, but it will arrive late in life – when the recipients are already in their late 50s or early 60s.
Rising aged-care costs introduce uncertainty. Some boomers spend where possible and gift money to adult children now through the “Bank of mum and dad”, but many will hold onto assets to secure care in later life.
This tension will shape family finances, family get-togethers and policy debates this the decade.
We will see more policies trying to coax boomers out of their family homes to encourage right-sizing of the collective housing stock.
Downsizing boomers will have surplus capital that wants to be invested or handed down to the millennial generation.
Boomers will have to seriously come to terms with their own mortality and decide on what legacy they want to leave – a lot of soul searching to improve life in retirement lies ahead.
Gen X (born 1964-81)
The squeezed middle approaches retirement
Gen X is the middle child of Australia.
As a small generation, sandwiched between the biggest and the richest generation, used to being overlooked.
Gen X faces a very stressful decade as it burns the candle from three ends – a weird candle, but stick with me.
Many Xers are supporting teenagers or university-aged children, while simultaneously assisting ageing parents and potentially having overextended their mortgages during the low-interest rate pandemic years.
The result is a triple squeeze on time, money and emotional bandwidth.
Career stability is another worry.
Workers in their 50s find it harder than younger workers to find an equal-paying job if let go than their younger colleagues.
If technology reshapes roles or companies downsize, the risk is that gen Xers experience lower earnings for the rest of their careers.
While most gen Xs will have paid into the superannuation system throughout their whole working life, they’ve done so at lower contribution rates.
Many will retire with decent, but not abundant, balances. The family home will continue to play a crucial role in their retirement planning.
On a random Tuesday in about 10 years, gen X will make their last mortgage payment, cut the kids off financial support and bury their last surviving parent.
In one big swoop, financial stressors disappear and a decade of financial freedom arrives – until then, gen X will feel the squeeze.
Millennials (born 1982-1999)
High skills, fragile balance sheets
Millennials are the most educated generation Australia has produced. Yet they face a more fragile financial trajectory than boomers or gen X.
Housing affordability remains the central challenge. Buying a home often requires parental support, which widens inequality within the cohort.
Stay informed, daily
Those who buy, do so later in life and with larger mortgages. That compresses the years available to pay down debt before retirement.
Family formation costs also loom large. Millennials started making babies at scale only around the start of the pandemic.
Childcare costs, rent and insurance have all risen faster than wages for many years. These expenses hit hardest during the decade in which millennials attempt to build savings, raise children and advance careers.
Combined with more volatile employment patterns, this creates a sense that financial life is choppy rather than linear. Even with rising lifetime incomes, it is harder to convert earnings into long term wealth.
On top of these, many millennials will be poorer than their boomer parents which leads to feelings of inadequacy.
Gen Z (born 2000-17)
An expensive launch into adulthood
Gen Z is entering adulthood with energy, creativity and strong digital skills. But the economic hurdles it faces are higher than for any recent cohort.
It is the first generation for whom home ownership in major cities does feel completely out of reach. Without access to parental wealth, many will remain long-term renters.
Education debt and longer study pathways mean they start accumulating savings later. Meanwhile rents in inner cities, where the best jobs cluster, absorb a large share of early career income.
Technology costs and transport are unavoidable. Progress can feel slow despite reasonable wage growth.
There is also a psychological layer to gen Z’s financial outlook. They grew up internalising climate risk, a housing crisis and constant social media comparison.
Their challenge is to stay hopeful and proactive in a system that often appears stacked against them.
So far, mental health data suggests they are doing worse than older cohort.
Gen alpha (born after 2018)
Their parents feel the pinch now
Gen alpha is still in school. Their financial challenges show up in their parents’ budgets.
Education-related costs keep climbing, from devices to excursions to extracurricular activities.
Families are investing heavily to keep children competitive in a digital and globalised world. This adds to household stress at a time when mortgages and rents are already high.
Alphas growing up in poorer households will especially feel the general cost-of-living pressures. Coupled with low homeownership rates among their parents, we can expect the gap between the haves and have-nots to widen.
Over the longer term they will inherit the fiscal consequences of today’s policy choices. Climate adaptation, aged care and public debt will shape the tax and price environment they enter as adults.
The big forces everyone will face
Across all generations, a few pressures cut through.
Housing remains the central economic dividing line. The gap between those who own and those who do not is widening. Within each generation, outcomes are diverging more by income and assets than by age.
An ageing population will reshape public budgets for decades. More retirees per worker will force hard choices on pensions, taxes, and health and aged care funding.
Younger workers will feel this in their pay slips as long as more than 50 per cent of the federal budget relies on income tax.
Older Australians will feel it in the amount of support the system can offer – you better not find yourself poor in old age as public coffers are emptying and a prolonged skills shortage drives up prices in the aged-care sector.
Then there is climate, which will show up in higher insurance premiums, infrastructure costs and relocation pressures as risk maps change.
These increases in public spending must be cut from some other program.
In Australia, we love to talk about generations as if they are locked in conflict. In reality, each cohort is dealing with its own set of pressures shaped by the era in which they grew up.
The more clearly we understand the structural forces shaping these financial challenges, the better we can design policies that help every generation thrive in the decade ahead and leave the stories of intergenerational conflict behind.
Simon Kuestenmacher is a co-founder of The Demographics Group. His columns, media commentary and public speaking focus on current socio-demographic trends and how these impact Australia. His podcast, Demographics Decoded, explores the world through the demographic lens. Follow Simon on Twitter (X), Facebook, or LinkedIn.
Want to see more stories from InDaily SA in your Google search results?
- Click here to set InDaily SA as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "InDaily SA". That's it.
