Today, readers comment on the Premier’s COVID press conferences and marketing the city’s main shopping strip.

Commenting on the opinion piece: Richardson: Marshall’s medium distorts the message
He is the democratically elected leader of the state. He should be at the table and should be at its head. If you don’t like it, vote him out. – Tony Britten-Jones
For several weeks I have watched Steve Marshall’s daily Covid updates for SA. It is notable that Nicola Spurrier rarely makes an appearance and that the Premier constantly spruiks the achievements of his government amongst the essential information about Covid stats etc that I want to hear about.
I’m tired of his political campaigning during these updates. He has lost my support as a long term Liberal supporter. The Premier should allow Professor Spurier to facilitate the daily updates so we can hear the truth and the important information we need to hear without the other “how wonderful we are” discourse. Is he so far removed from reality that he believes we can’t see what he is really doing? – Mike Williams
Commenting on the story: Half of Rundle Mall management budget spent on office, salaries
As a former chair of the RMMA and an initial board member for eight years, I find it difficult to understand the point of this article.
It may be to give aggrieved traders (or landlords) who don’t want to pay the levy, a forum to complain. Of course they would rather not pay if they could get the promotion and management of the precinct for free but that hardly seems practical.
The article may be to point out increases in security and cleaning costs which, in these days of COVID, should be obvious to anyone. It may be to suggest that spending half the money raised through the levy on salaries and an office is somehow inefficient or offensive. I’m not sure how anyone would expect the office to perform the role without appropriate funding. The funds used to (and I assume still does) include salaries of precinct security, day to day management of casual Mall traders, promotions and advertising, cleaning staff, events management and overall precinct development.
Expecting it to perform its role without appropriate staffing defies logic. It is the role of the RMMA also to communicate with the landlords and traders and perhaps their lack of knowledge is because they haven’t attended functions designed to inform of what is occurring. At the start in 2008 (from memory) our remit was to be an advocate for the traders and landlords with council and state government, clean the place up, keep it secure, reinvigorate it with a total makeover and attract new traders and more people back to the Mall. Also get city workers to spend more time in the Mall.
Look at the outcomes:
It would be fair to say that the RMMA’s greatest failing was being unable to convince the Council to reduce parking fees in the precinct. This is the albatross for the precinct and will require considerable courage to address but should not be left out of the debate.
All in all, the article could have been more balanced and less structured around controversy. Hopefully, the above details might add the balance needed. – Eric Granger
Want to see more stories from InDaily SA in your Google search results?