
Australia’s economy will take a $29 billion hit if the next generation of submarines is built overseas, a new report says.
Conversely, the report estimates a $20 billion direct expenditure boost to the national economy if the subs are built in Australia.
The report, by the National Institute of Economics and Industry’s executive director Peter Brain, compares the relative economic merits of buying locally built or imported submarines to replace the Navy’s Collins Class vessels.
Brain presented his findings to the Senate Economics References Committee into naval shipbuilding in Melbourne today.
It compares two scenarios:
The report was commissioned by South Australia’s Economic Development Board (EDB) as the State builds its case for retention of naval shipbuilding.
“Initial indications are that importing Australia’s next generation submarines would be an economic mistake,” EDB chair Raymond Spencer said today.
“Not just for South Australia but for Australia as a whole.
“And I emphasise that we have taken a very conservative view of the relative costs and benefits.”
Key results for scenario 1: Build overseas
Key results for scenario 2: Build overseas design locally
Brain says the overwhelming conclusion is that it will cost no more to build locally.
This is partly because Australia has a unique set of operating environments and requirements – there is no off-the-shelf solution available, and partly
because there are only four potential international partners to build the submarines – Germany, France, Japan and Sweden – and they are all high cost countries.